Categories
Complete Streets Policy Safety & Education

Testimony for Safer Streets

We gave the following testimony before the People’s Hearing held on June 27th at the Durfee Innovation Society in Detroit:

In the past 10 years, there have been over a quarter million reported traffic crashes on Detroit streets. 

1,265 people have died in these crashes. 74 fatalities were under 18 years old. 383 were vulnerable road users – pedestrians and bicyclists. African-Americans were roughly 76% of all fatalities.

Why are there so many deaths on Detroit streets?

It’s mostly due to the speed of vehicles. Higher speeds result in more crashes and higher injury severity. This is especially true for vulnerable road users, most notably youth and seniors.

One problem is newer vehicles have more horsepower and are getting larger, higher, and heavier. This is a federal issue that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has been unwilling to address.

But the local issue is our street designs. Detroit’s road network was built for 2 million people. Then it built a freeway network and the population fell by 1.3 million. We now have an abundance of unnecessarily wide roads. They not only encourage speeding – and even drag racing – they are difficult to cross. They are Dangerous by Design. 

The most dangerous roads in Detroit are owned by the state and MDOT has been reluctant to fix them. Even when these roads are made safer, the state refuses to maintain the portions used by pedestrians and bicyclists. 

In fact, MDOT’s ADA Transition Plan falsely claims that the state somehow does not even own the sidewalks they’ve installed on their roads. 

So what are the solutions?

First, we need MDOT to be accountable for their streets. They don’t get to only maintain the portions for vehicles. These are state assets and MDOT needs to acknowledge this. They should not require local communities to maintain parts of state roads as a prerequisite for getting safer roads – and, yes, this is actually their policy.

Second, safer road designs must be the standard, not an option. The state needs to budget safety features into road projects from the beginning and not struggle to find additional funding later. 

Third, the state needs to set safety targets and prioritize their road funding to meet them. Today they simply have researches estimate how many people will die on Michigan roads and that’s their target. Some years these targets have been raised despite MDOT’s declared commitment to the Towards Zero Deaths. 

Fourth, the state needs to make public transit, walking, and biking a safe choice for everyone. This is the real solution to reducing transportation carbon emissions, but also for making our roads safer. Being on the bus with 20 others and a professional driver is a lot safer than 20 people in their own cars. People walking and biking rarely cause harm to others.

Finally, I must acknowledge that changes at the US DOT are handcuffing some of these safety efforts. The Transportation Secretary is restricting Detroit and other cities’ ability to remove unnecessary vehicle lanes, reduce speeding, and make our roads safer. It’s part of his Freedom to Drive Initiative. 

The best solution for that is to vote in the November 2028 presidential elections.

Categories
Complete Streets Events Greenways Newsletter Policy

Looking back on 2025

When we started this work over 18 years ago, the pace of improvements for biking, walking and rolling was no where near as impressive as it is today. Where we used to have to scrape for news to share, we now have too much to report — and this is a good thing. So, if we were to put together a 2025 double-record greatest hits album, below are the tracks!

Read More

Categories
Complete Streets

I-375 Project Changes

Despite rumors of its eminent death, the I-375 replacement project is continuing to move forward albeit with changes.

In August, the Governor paused the project ($) primarily due to its increasing costs and local business concerns about disruptions during construction. In September, Eric Larson, CEO of the Downtown Detroit Partnership offered the “only viable solutions” in an opinion piece ($): Break the project into two phases or just rebuild it as is. Needless to say, we didn’t support the latter solution. (Surprisingly, Mayor Duggan did appear to support an I-375 rebuild when we asked him.)

We continued our conversations with MDOT, DDP, and Kresge Foundation. In the end, we felt we could support a two-phase approach. It was better than what we had.

The first phase would replace I-375 south of Gratiot with a boulevard as previously envisioned. It would remove the “Jefferson Curve” and address the three failing bridges (Jefferson, Lafayette and Larned). It would also address the failing Gratiot bridge over the Dequindre Cut. It would include a two-way cycletrack from Gratiot to the RiverWalk, which we really like.

The second phase would be a redesign of the I-75 interchange and the removal of the Fisher Freeway stub connection to Gratiot. This gives MDOT more time to work with major stakeholders in that area, specifically Eastern Market businesses, and develop better strategies for limiting negative impacts during construction. Unfortunately, the Montcalm cycletrack between Ford Field and Eastern Market would get pushed back to this later phase. We didn’t like hearing that this could be pushed back by 10 years or so.

Will the USDOT support this? We’ll find out. Their grant covers a large portion of the costs.

If you missed the November 2025 community meeting that discussed much of the above, there is a livestream recording available. The presentation and displays will eventually be added to MDOT’s I-375 Detroit webpage.

Categories
Complete Streets

Downtown Detroit Bike Network Map

This post originally appeared on the Detroitography:

The Detroit Green Task Force visited Philadelphia earlier this year to learn from that city’s sustainability efforts. The group included city councilmembers, department directors, sustainability advocates and others. As co-chair of the GTF Transportation and Mobility committee (and executive director of the Detroit Greenways Coalition), my focus was learning what they did best in helping people use green travel modes.

One big takeaway was Philly had a very decent bike network in their Center City — a sharp contrast with Downtown Detroit, which only has the Cass bike lanes and RiverWalk.

It got us to thinking what would a bike network look like in Detroit?

We came up with this vision map. The solid lines are existing bike lanes, though we did fudge things to include the forthcoming bike lanes on Michigan Avenue east of Cass. We also could have made Wilkins and Grand River solid but those bike lanes need some improvement.All of the dashed lines are proposed bike lanes. Some could get built in the near-term, too:

  • MDOT will be constructing Hastings and Montcalm as part of the I-375 Reconnecting Communities project.
  • MDOT has initial designs for Gratiot Avenue.
  • DDP has plans to build an Adams cycletrack.
  • A portion of the Second Avenue is getting built with the Water Square and Huntington Place improvement project.

What about Woodward? It should have bike lanes, but of course the curb-running Q Line makes that much more difficult.

What are your thoughts? Would building out this bike lane network help you get around Downtown Detroit?

Categories
Complete Streets Policy

2025 Detroit Primary

As a 501c3 non-profit, we cannot endorse candidates for elected office. However, we can share what they’ve said about things that matter to us.

Detroit Environmental Agenda

We’re a founding member of the DEA and this is the group’s third voter’s guide. While the entire guide is worth reading, here are their responses to topics most related to our work.

Environmental Issues

  1. Doubling the DDOT budget
  2. Doubling the budget for the Office of Sustainability
  3. Expanding truck routes ordinance citywide
  4. Continued implementation of the City’s Streets for People Plan
  5. Continued implementation of the City’s Climate Strategy

Mayoral candidates Jonathan Barlow, Fred Durhall III, Saunteel Jenkins and Mary Sheffield answered yes to all of the above. Joel Haashim did not specify.

There were more varied answers among the council candidates

NameDistrict12345
Valerie ParkerAt-largeNANANANANA
Mary WatersAt-largeYesYesYesYesYes
Coleman A. Young IIIAt-largeYesNoYesYesYes
Roy McCallisterDistrict 2YesYesYesYesYes
Angela Whitfield CallowayDistrict 2YesNoYesYesYes
Scott BensonDistrict 3NANAYesNANA
Latisha JohnsonDistrict 4YesYesYesYesYes
Willie BurtonDistrict 5YesYesYesYesYes
Tatjana JacksonDistrict 5YesYesYesYesYes
Michael Steven Ri’chardDistrict 5YesNAYesYesYes
Tyrone CarterDistrict 6YesYesYesYesYes
Gabriella Santiago-RomeroDistrict 6YesYesYesYesYes
Denzel Anton McCampbellDistrict 7YesYesYesYesYes
Regina RossDistrict 7YesYesYesYesYes

The candidates did provide additional text answers to these five question, which are included in the DEA Vote Guide.

Note that not all of the mayoral and council candidates responded.

Mayoral Candidate Forum

The Detroit Parks Coalition and Bridge Detroit hosted a forum in July. Unfortunately the event ran long and we were unable to ask our question about greenways. Even still, those that participated spoke highly of parks and greenways.

I-375 Questionaire

The ReThink I-375 Community Coalition asked the mayoral candidates questions about the MDOT I-375 project. One question was, “While not all of the new roads developed through this project will be in the City of Detroit’s jurisdiction, what do you think your role as Mayor should be in ensuring safe, vibrant roadways for both motorized and non-motorized use result from this project?”

Candidates Durhall, Jenkins, Perkins, and Sheffield all provided answers, but some added more detail on the non-motorized aspect:

Jenkins: “The non-motorized pavement for walking and biking need to be clearly separated from the heavy traffic of the surface streets. Safety has to be a top priority.”

Perkins: “Ensuring Safety for All Users: Road safety should be a top priority, and I will work to ensure that all new and redesigned roads include features that protect both motorized and non-motorized users. This includes dedicated bike lanes, safe pedestrian crossings, improved signage, and well-lit areas to ensure that everyone can safely navigate the streets, day or night. I will advocate for a “complete streets” approach, ensuring that the infrastructure supports all modes of transportation, whether it’s driving, biking, walking, or using public transit.”

Sheffield: “Designs that prioritize pedestrian and bike safety must also be premiered here, just as we are prioritizing redesigned and safer roadways within our neighborhoods.”

Categories
Complete Streets Policy

Complete Streets Ordinance

Below are comments we gave before Detroit City Council:

We are continuing to advocate for the city council to adopt a Complete Streets ordinance. 

Complete Streets are those that are designed for all users – motorists, transit users, pedestrians, people with disabilities, bicyclists, and more. Complete Streets make it easier for everyone to safely travel along and across the street. 

We began our ordinance work 15 years ago and much has changed. Back then, we saw the ordinance as a tool to get the city to build Complete Streets. 

While we weren’t successful in passing that initial ordinance, we were successful in pushing for change. Detroit now has a Complete Streets Department and an excellent Streets for People Transportation Plan. It’s built some amazing Complete Street projects including streetscapes. Thousands of speed humps and other traffic calming features have been installed. And, DPW has been very successful tapping into state and federal funding to make this happen.

So why do we need an ordinance today?

We believe a Complete Streets ordinance can codify what the city is doing today, while giving the city more leverage in getting the state and county to do the same. 

We don’t expect the ordinance to change course or have any major effect on the DPW budget. Those changes have already occurred. 

Still, we believe this ordinance is as important as ever. 

As we’re seeing right now in Washington DC, a new administration can abruptly shift a transportation department’s direction away from best practices. An ordinance could dissuade this from happening in Detroit. 

Detroit had 130 traffic fatalities in 2023 with 28% being pedestrians, so clearly there is a continued need to emphasize safer street designs. 

We believe an ordinance would help keep us on that path.